Site icon Business Manchester

Uber Concealed Data Breach Impacting 57 Million Users

71c229e9 008c 9b30 0484 f83327499792

Uber, a global leader in ride-hailing services, recently came under fire for concealing a significant data breach. This shocking revelation has raised concerns about the company’s data protection policies and overall transparency.

The breach, which occurred in 2016, compromised the personal information of 57 million customers and drivers. This article delves into the intricate details of the breach, its implications, and Uber’s response to this alarming incident.

The Breach Uncovered

Uber’s 2016 data breach is a major cause for concern. The company admitted that hackers accessed a substantial amount of personal data, affecting 57 million users. This information included names, email addresses, and mobile phone numbers of customers, as well as the licence details of 600,000 drivers.

According to reports, Uber paid the hackers $100,000 (£75,000) to delete the stolen information. This covert operation raises critical questions about Uber’s commitment to user privacy and its reluctance to disclose such a critical incident to the public.

Executive Knowledge and Internal Changes

Former CEO Travis Kalanick was reportedly aware of the breach for over a year before it became public. This delay in disclosure only came to light after Bloomberg broke the story, putting significant pressure on Uber’s leadership to address the issue.

In response to the internal pressure and various controversies, Kalanick was replaced by Dara Khosrowshahi in August. Khosrowshahi has since acknowledged the breach and stated that they are monitoring the affected accounts, albeit without offering excuses for the delay in disclosure.

Security Measures and Company Response

Despite reassurances from Uber’s current CEO that no fraud or misuse tied to the breach has been detected, the company is taking steps to enhance security.

Affected drivers have received free credit monitoring protection. However, Uber’s decision not to extend this protection to its customers has been met with criticism, highlighting potential discrepancies in how Uber values its stakeholders. Additionally, Joe Sullivan, Uber’s chief security officer, has left the company following the breach.

Hacking Details

The breach was executed by two hackers who managed to access a private area of the software development platform GitHub.

The hackers then located Uber’s login credentials for Amazon Web Services (AWS), which housed the company’s data. This method shows a significant vulnerability in Uber’s data management processes, raising questions about the security protocols in place at the time of the breach.

Previous Incidents and Regulatory Impact

Uber is no stranger to data breaches. In January, the company was fined $20,000 for failing to disclose a separate 2014 data breach.

This pattern of repeated incidents raises concerns about Uber’s data security practices and its adherence to regulatory requirements. It also puts the company under scrutiny from various regulatory bodies, potentially leading to further fines and sanctions.

Public Reaction and Future Steps

The public reaction to Uber’s handling of the breach has been overwhelmingly negative. Customers and drivers alike feel betrayed by the company’s lack of transparency and inadequate response measures.

Moving forward, Uber must re-evaluate its data protection policies and ensure more robust security measures. The company’s leadership should prioritize rebuilding trust with its user base and working closely with regulatory authorities to prevent future incidents.


The Uber data breach underscores the importance of stringent data security measures and transparent communication practices. Companies must prioritize their users’ privacy and be proactive in addressing security vulnerabilities.

Uber’s recent actions highlight the need for significant improvements in its approach to data protection, especially in regaining public trust. The ongoing scrutiny will undoubtedly shape the company’s future cybersecurity strategies.

Exit mobile version