Site icon Business Manchester

Mulberry Dismisses Frasers Group’s Enhanced Takeover Bid

2912437c c1c5 3fbb 95c3 4824dc073964

Mulberry has firmly turned down the revised acquisition proposal from Frasers Group, viewing it as a distraction from their recovery efforts amidst financial difficulties.

The luxury brand remains focused on its strategic plans for turnaround, with Frasers given until 28 October to decide on making a firm offer or withdrawing their interest.

Challice, holding a significant 56.1% stake in Mulberry, has resolutely declined Frasers Group’s revised takeover bid. Controlled by Ong Beng Seng and Christina Ong, the influential Singaporean billionaires, Challice’s decision underscores a strategic refusal rooted in maintaining control and stability at Mulberry. This firm rejection is pivotal, impeding Frasers’ path to obtaining a controlling interest without Challice’s support.

Frasers aims to integrate Mulberry into its broader retail strategy, professing confidence in steering the brand towards profitability. However, without Challice’s endorsement, this acquisition remains uncertain, especially as Mulberry progresses with its internal recovery efforts.

Frasers Group remains determined to avert a situation reminiscent of Debenhams, asserting its capability to revitalise the brand’s business operations. However, the focus on internal restructuring by Mulberry showcases a different approach to recovery, diverging from external acquisition strategies.

Challice’s stance not only communicates a clear message to Frasers but also reassures stakeholders of their commitment to Mulberry’s independent growth and innovation. The Ong family’s involvement plays a crucial role in navigating these corporate waters with caution and precision.

The luxury market’s volatility amidst global economic shifts adds a layer of complexity to Mulberry’s decision-making processes. However, their focus on strengthening core operations positions them favourably against these external pressures.

The luxury market’s demanding nature necessitates strategic agility and robustness. Frasers’ ability to adapt will likely determine their success or withdrawal in this acquisition attempt.

Mulberry’s decision to dismiss Frasers’ bid demonstrates their resolve to prioritise internal growth over external acquisition pressures. This approach highlights their commitment to autonomy in steering through financial challenges.


Mulberry’s choice to decline the revised bid underscores their autonomous strategy in navigating financial recovery.

The scenario reflects broader dynamics in the luxury market, with stakeholding and strategic direction at its core.

Exit mobile version