Site icon Business Manchester

House of Lords Recommends Delay in HMRC’s Digital Taxation Launch

House of Lords Recommends Delay in HMRC s Digital Taxation Launch

The House of Lords has called for a delay in HMRC’s digital tax initiative. Their proposal highlights concerns about readiness and risk.

This suggested postponement comes amid growing apprehension about the programme’s timeline and its potential impact on businesses.

Calls for Postponement

In a strong recommendation, a House of Lords committee has advised HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to delay the initiation of its ‘Making Tax Digital for Business’ programme. The committee’s call for postponement stems from concerns about what they describe as “unjustifiable risks” linked to the current implementation timetable.

This caution echoes previous criticisms from the House of Commons Treasury committee hearing in January. The Treasury committee had expressed concerns over the Aprill 2018 deadline for mandating digital tax records, suggesting that businesses are unprepared for such a significant transition.

The primary apprehension centres around the readiness of small businesses, which may not have the necessary infrastructure or resources to comply with new digital demands. The potential administrative and financial burdens on these entities are of particular concern.

Call for Comprehensive Testing

Committee Chairman Lord Hollick highlighted the unpreparedness of many small businesses and landlords. He argued that these groups are either unaware of or unable to cope with the added burden digital taxation imposes.

He strongly emphasised the need for a comprehensive pilot programme. This would not only test the software but also evaluate the financial and administrative impacts on businesses. “A full pilot will ensure the software works and provide hard evidence of the additional financial and administrative burdens on businesses,” Lord Hollick stated.

The current pilot, planned to begin next month, reportedly does not meet the government’s best practice guidelines. Critics argue that it fails to allow sufficient time for assessing software and processes thoroughly.

Concerns Over Technical Details

Adding to the concerns is the lack of finality regarding technical specifications. The Lords highlighted that HMRC has yet to finalise its systems’ technical requirements, exacerbating implementation anxiety.

These unresolved technical details pose a risk not just to businesses but also to tax practitioners and the software industry involved in supporting the new system. This uncertainty threatens to destabilise the necessary preparatory work required from all sectors involved.

Without concrete and detailed technical guidelines, businesses and software providers cannot begin to align their systems effectively, leaving them in the dark about future obligations and adjustments.

Overcoming Timetable Challenges

The Lords’ committee emphasised the “universal concern” among stakeholders about the implementation timeline. The current schedule for digital record-keeping mandates, according to them, is overly ambitious and presents undue risks for all parties involved.

To mitigate these issues, they advocate for an extension of the pilot period. This would facilitate a thorough end-to-end evaluation and reduce unnecessary risks for both HMRC and businesses. Their recommendation to defer the mandatory digital record-keeping and quarterly reporting until April 2020 reflects this.

It is hoped that this extension will allow a smoother transition, ensuring all systems are robust and stakeholders are adequately prepared for the switch.

Alignment with Best Practices

The committee stressed the importance of aligning with best practice guidelines. They argue that any deviation could undermine the programme’s success and the trust of those required to participate.

Implementing such a fundamental system change demands thorough vetting and adherence to established practices to ensure both efficacy and security. The Lords believe this alignment is crucial to achieving the intended outcomes of this digital transformation.

By ensuring compliance with best practices, HMRC can foster trust and readiness among businesses, which will be pivotal in the programme’s overall acceptance and effectiveness.

Broader Implications for Stakeholders

The potential pitfalls of hastening the programme could result in significant setbacks for multiple stakeholders, including businesses, HMRC, and software developers.

The committee’s warning serves as a reminder of the complex nature of digital transformation in tax systems. It’s not simply about technology but ensuring that people, processes, and policies align seamlessly.

Stakeholders must be prepared not only technologically but also culturally and operationally to embrace the changes this programme heralds. Therefore, a cautious and well-prepared approach is deemed necessary.

Conclusion of Report

The Lords concluded their report with a strong recommendation for strategic patience. They urge a deferment of compulsory measures related to digital taxation until a more feasible date.

Their call for a pause is grounded in the need to safeguard businesses and ensure successful implementation, marking a move towards strategic prudence in public policy.


In summary, the Lords’ recommendation to delay HMRC’s digital taxation initiative reflects a commitment to protecting businesses from undue risks. A carefully managed transition, aligned with best practices, will be key to its ultimate success.

Exit mobile version